原文:I started wearing the Saucony Guides back with version 2, and have worn (or tried) every version since. Saucony is all over the map with this series. Some of them have been great, others were drastic changes. My all time favorite was the Guide 2, followed by the Guide 8. The Guide 9's were horrible,
so I switched over to the Brooks Ravenna, and thought I was going to no longer be a Saucony customer.I needed a new pair and decided to try the Guide 10, and am glad I did. Shoes have been great so far, once the glaring problem was resolved.These shoes fit small, and are narrower than the previous versions. They are at least 1/2 size smaller than they used to be. I have been a 10 1/2 D in Saucony since the Guide 2. Not so with the Guide 10. Why do running shoe companies change the basic fundamentals of the shoe when they come out with a new model? New materials, sure, but making a shoe smaller and narrower just doesn't make sense.Would have given them five stars if not for the sizing issue. Huge improvement over the Guide 9 for me.
显示更多>>
译文:从 2 开始,我就开始穿Saucony Guides 了,而且后来的每一个款式都穿过(或者试过)。 Saucony 这个系列的款式已经遍布了。其中有些是很好的,其他的变化比较大。我最喜欢的是“Guide 2”,其次就是“guide 8”。“Guide 9”感觉非常糟糕,所以我开始尝试Brooks Ravenna,并且觉得我不再喜欢Saucony了。
我需要一双新的鞋子,所以开始决定尝试Guide 10,很高兴我买了它。有什么问题都可以马上解决,鞋子是目前为止我穿过的非常好的了。
这些鞋的小码就比较合适了 ,比以前的款式窄一点。他们至少比以前的小半寸。自“Guide”系列以来,我一直穿的是Saucony的10 1/ 2D码。不同于Guide 10.为什么跑鞋公司在出现新的模型时改变了鞋子的基本原理?当然,用了新材料,但使鞋子变得更窄更窄是没有意义的。
如果不是大小尺寸问题的话,会给他们五颗星。对于我来说,Guide 9 还需要巨大改进。