原文:First thing everyone says about the Modulus is that it is a Stryfe. It is similar to one but has key differences, many of which are good. The main bad difference is that it is more expensive, but now I think it is worth it's price tag in overall value over the Stryfe (nothing is better in value, r
eally, but Stryfes' need to be modded to be good anyway, so the hassle makes that debatable). Some smaller things that comes to mind is the size, as the modulus is larger and has a carrying handle on the upper back of the blaster that makes it's flip-up iron sight useless. The battery door doubles as a handle grip under the blaster, which I thought was cool. It comes with a lot more attachments, which is the key selling point for this toy: the barrel allows for another barrel to be attached and, by itself, does not affect ranges by as much as the Retaliator/Recon barrel; the scope is lense-less but has a cool targeting sight; the foregrip is comfortable; the stock is useful in carrying an extra magazine but is noticeably flimsy and wobbly with enough pressure on the plastic bars; and there is a Demolisher-style 10-dart banana magazine included with the set. Velocity ratings on my ProChrono Digital chronograph are as follows: the average stock velocity is 72 feet per second (FPS); Unmodified but with 3 Tenergy LiFePo4 batteries and a dummy spacer averaged 91 FPS. The best difference between the Stryfe and the Modulus is that testing of the LiFePo4 batteries in a Nerf War suggests the thermistor/ resistors of the Modulus are more tolerant and do not necessarily need to be removed since no-one complained of it overheating during play (like they did with the Stryfe many times before thermistor/resistor and electronic lock removals). However, there is a noticeable spool-up lag when first pressing the rev-trigger and this 1-second delay is something you will have to live with if you decide to use the recommended alkaline batteries. Further good differences the Modulus has over the Stryfe include the fact that it is paint-friendly and the different Modulus' parts come apart easily when the blaster is opened. Check out my pictures below, I hydro-dipped and hand-painted different parts of mine (one gold and black, another a hydrographic with carbon fiber and flames, and a more recent one I mask-painted a classic Cobra, Python Patrol snakeskin pattern). In all honestly, get both the Stryfe and the Modulus kits (there are many different ones now, including the bolt-action slam-fire able Tristrike) that suit your fancy. The accessory parts are all interchangeable with most other Nerf Blasters, namely the Stryfe, Retaliator, Tristrike, even the Ionfire (it's all true, but I'm joking about the Ionfire; don't do that). As an update, I have been using my setup for almost a year now. Still going strong with the 3 AA 3.2V LiFePo4 batteries and an AA sized (Ultracell; a conduit placeholder) spacer. I have also used 2 Lion 3.7V and 2 spacers, and a 3.7V IMR with 2 spacers and both work, but I decided that it is best to use the 2 AA-sized IMRs, because there is less strain on the batteries and they will last longer; so I will be using those IMRs in the future. I use a Nitecore Digicharger D4 battery charger, it works great and I recommend it. Please mod responsibly, as using higher voltage batteries can be damaging to, and shorten the life of the product.
显示更多>>
译文:
第一件事,每个人都说,这是一个模仿stryfe的产品,它和它相似,但也有很明显的区别,其中许多是这款产品更占优势。主要缺点只是在于这款产品的价格比较贵,但现在我认为这是值得的,真的,因为Stryfes需要改装,反正是很麻烦的,但这个会话题还是会有很多争议的。在冲击器的上背部有一个活动手柄,使得它可以转动镜头。电池门兼作把手,我觉得很酷。它有很多的附件,这是关键的卖点,这个玩具:允许被连接;范围较小但有一个很酷的瞄准镜头;握把舒适;但塑料棒上的压力明显脆弱和不稳定;还有一个破坏者风格的设置。我的prochrono数字计时速度等级如下:设计的平均速度为72英尺每秒(fps);间隔平均91帧。Stryfe和模量最大的区别是在削弱战争测试的磷酸铁锂电池的热敏电阻,模量更宽容,不一定需要被删除,因为没有人抱怨它过热。然而,当一个阀芯明显的落后时,首先按下启动触发,如果你决定使用推荐的碱性电池,那你将不得不忍受这1秒的延迟。看看我的照片下面,用水浸泡和手绘的不同部分(一个金色和黑色,另一个水文与碳纤维和火焰,和一个更近的我画皮经典的眼镜蛇,蟒蛇巡逻蛇皮纹)。老实说,让Stryfe和模量(人们让其有很多不同)适合你的幻想的配件都可以互换,不像其他大多数的枪,会因此削弱放炮的力,这就是Stryfe,tristrike,甚至ionfire(这一切都是真的,但我对ionfire;从不开玩笑)。作为一个新产品,我已经使用我近一年的时间来安装。依然强劲的3节AA 32v的磷酸铁锂电池。我也用37V,和一个有2个间隔的37v ,但我决定,最好使用2节AA大小的,因为有更少的压力可以使他们的电池将持续更长的时间;所以我将在未来使用这些电池。我用digicharger Nitecore D4的电池充电器,它很好用,我很推荐。在使用这款产品时要注意,因为使用电压较高的电池可能会损坏,并缩短产品的使用寿命。