原文： I came across this jacket when I was shopping more established brands and, after settling for a medium sized Marmot Zeuss discounted @ $120, I decided to also try one of these $34 Hawke jackets in medium size as well. I dont think I would have done so was it not for the free shipping and returns, bu
t I am glad I did.
The cut and fit of the Hawke is quite similar to the Marmot, as can be seen in the attached pictures. I am 5'9, 172#, reasonably athletic build and The Hawke fits as expected - maybe a bit on the large side fashion wise, but just about perfect for capturing a lot of air under a shell jacket, which is the traditional use of these thin puffer jackets. I was happy to to find that contrary to the Amazon description, there is no "provided pouch" for storage. Rather the Hawke packs into its own left pocket like most brand name puffers. The green color of the jacket I received is a bit more dull than the Amazon picture. The inside fabric of the jacket is made of a nice glossy black synthetic material. Like all packable puffers the fabric is thin and lightweight, which is perfect when used under a GoreTex shell, but makes it unsuitable as a primary work coat, as it is will likely tear if it snags on a sharp object. It may do as a primary jacket for walking around town in above freezing temperatures, but hardly for real winter weather.
As far as build quality goes I am also pleasantly surprised. I am not a seamstress and maybe I got lucky, but close inspection of zippers, seams, down distribution etc reveals nothing to complain about. The overall weight of the Hawke is 9.7oz. This is almost 40% less than the Marmot and given that the fabric seems to be of similar weight, I assume this means it has about 40% less down, which makes sense as the Marmot looks and feels noticable "puffier". Furthermore the Marmot specifies a 700 fill power down that has been treated to better resist moisture - the Achilles heel of all down products. Hawke does not make any claims pertaining to down quality, which likely means sub 400 rated, untreated down, so in short less down of less quality makes for a colder jacket, especially when it gets moist.
To sum it up the Marmot is certainly nicer, but at about 1/4 the price. the Hawke is the better value. In fact, the Hawke cost less than some of my fleece jackets, and it beats all of them both in warmth and weight. I'm very glad I purchased it (with my OWN money - I do not write favorable reviews in return for free samples!) and am happy to report that it is doing fine in its new home in my BUG bag in the trunk of my car.
As a final note, the price trends for this jacket can be found on this excellent site: http://camelcamelcamel.com/Hawke-Co-Packable-Shoulder-Stitching/product/B013GRPDTQ
If you found this review useful, please rate it as such. If you found it lacking, please write a reply and I'll answer whatever question as best I can :)
显示更多>>
译文： 我是在购买知名品牌时偶然发现这件夹克的，在花了120美元买了一件中等尺寸的Marmot Zeuss后，我决定也试试这款34美元的中号 Hawke羽绒服。如果不是为了免费运输和返回，我不认为我会这样做，但我很高兴我还是做到。Hawke的剪裁和配饰与 Marmot非常相似，可以在附件的图片中看到。我身高5英尺9英寸，172#，有一定的运动能力，Hawke的款型也和预期的一样可能有点大偏的时尚感，但对于保暖来说是完美的，这是传统的薄羽绒服。我很高兴地发现，与亚马逊的描述相反，没有“提供的小口袋”用于存储。相反，Hawke也有装东西的左口袋，就像大多数品牌一样。我收到的这件羽绒服的绿色比亚马逊的照片要暗一些。这件羽绒服的内层织物是由一种光滑的黑色合成材料制成的。和所有可打包的蓬松物一样，这种布料又薄又轻，在GoreTex下使用是完美的，但它不适合作为主要的工作外套，因为如果它碰到尖锐的物体，很可能会撕裂。在寒冷的气温下在城里散步时，它可能是一件主要的外套，但对于真正的冬季天气来说，它就很难穿了。就质量而言，我也感到惊喜。我不是一个裁缝，但我会仔细检查拉链，接缝，等东西，没有什么可抱怨的。Hawke的总重量是9.7盎司。这比Marmot小了近40%，而且考虑到布料的重量和土拨鼠差不多，我想这意味着它的羽绒减少了40%。此外，Marmot还指定了一个700的填充量，且经过了更好的防潮处理这是所有羽绒产品的致命弱点。Hawke没有对羽绒质量提出任何要求，这可能意味着羽绒的等级低于400填充量，是未经处理的羽绒，所以简而言之，低质量的羽绒会使羽绒服不保暖，特别是当它变得潮湿时。总之，Marmot当然更好，但价格却贵了四倍。Hawke实惠。实际上，Hawke的价格比我的一些羊毛衫还便宜，而且它在保暖和重量上都胜过了所有的羊毛衫。我很高兴我买了它(用我自己的钱我不写好评来换取免费的样品!)，我很高兴地告诉大家，它在我汽车后备箱里的新家里过得很好。最后要说明的是，这件夹克的价格趋势可以在这个很棒的网站上找到:http://camelcamelcamel.com/hawke - co - packable - shoulder - stitch/product/b013grpdtq如果你觉得这篇评论有用，请这样评价它。如果你发现它不足，请写一个回复，我会尽我所能回答任何问题:
