econds a day. Very disappointing, given the cost of the watch. The second was an Orient Snorkeler that worked okay but eventually stopped running. The third was a no-name that I bought on e-bay from Hong Kong with a miyota movement.
There were several things that caused me to initially shy away from this Invicta in the past. Most notably was all of the Invicta badging on their products, and the negative comments about that and the watch band.
The quality of the movement on this watch makes up for all of the badging issues. It is a Seiko hacking movement, and it is the most accurate movement of any automatic watch I've ever owned (and I've been wearing automatics since the 1960s). I've been wearing it for a little over a week now, and it has only gained a total of three seconds (not three seconds a day, but three seconds overall). I think that is pretty amazing for a timepiece that only cost $85.
The watch is very handsome, and gets a lot of looks and compliments. The "INCVICTA" engraving on the left side of the case is actually very subtle and not that noticeable. This might be more of an issue for those who wear the watch on their right wrist, but for those who wear it on the left, it is hardly visible. I actually like the wing on the short end of the second hand and on the face of the watch. The luminous dot on the second hand is probably 1/8" closer to the end of the hand than the dot on most other homages (and the real thing), but this actually causes it to sweep directly over the luminous hour dots on the face of the watch as it moves, which I think is cool. The watch band has received some negative reviews and I am not sure why. It is a thick, heavy-weight band and is of much higher quality than what was was furnished with any of the other Submariner homage watches that I have owned (by comparison, the one on the Orient was terrible to the point that it had to be replaced). Some don't like the shiny center kinks on the provided band, but I do. It looks good and has been durable so far. One other positive attribute worth noting about this watch is the magnification quality of the date cyclops. It actually does a good job of really magnifying, unlike on some of the others that I own (only the Steinhart magnifies the date this well). Some have complained that the bezel ring is hard to turn, and I initially experienced the same thing. A youtube video suggested soaking the watch in water for up to an hour then turning the bezel ring while wet. I performed this procedure twice and it did the trick. Now the bezel ring moves easily enough but is still very tight and wiggle free. The bezel has 120 clicks vice the more common 60 clicks.
So for 85 bucks, you get a very good looking Submariner homage with a hacking Seiko movement that is nearly as accurate as a quartz watch. Whats not to like?

有几件事让我在过去最初买的时候不太愿意用Invicta。最值得注意的是Invicta对其产品的所有标记，以及对该表和表带的负面评论。

这款腕表的机芯质量弥补了所有的负面问题。这是一款精工黑客机芯，它是我拥有的所有自动手表中最准确的机芯（自20世纪60年代以来我一直都在佩戴自动手表）。我已经戴了一个多星期了，它总共只有三个指针（不是一天三秒钟，但总共是三个指针）。我觉得这款腕表只花了85美元，真是太棒了。

这款手表非常漂亮，外观上收到了很多赞美。表壳左侧的“INCVICTA”雕刻实际上非常微妙，但是并不明显。对于那些在右手腕上佩戴手表的人来说，这可能是一个更大的问题，但对于那些在左手上佩戴手表的人来说，这几乎是不可见的。实际上我喜欢秒针短端和手表表盘。秒针上的发光点可能比大多数其他图像（和真实物体）上的点更接近手的末端大概1/8的地方，它扫过表盘的发光小时点时我会觉得它很酷。手表表带收到了一些负面评论，我不知道为什么。它是一个很笨重的重量级表带，质量远远高于任何配饰。我所拥有的其他Submariner homage手表（相比之下，东方的手表很糟糕，以至于它必须被更换）。有些人不喜欢所提供表带的上亮闪闪的东西，但我不是。它看起来很好，并且到目前为止一直很耐用。另一个值得关注的是这款手表的质量。它实际上做得非常好，不像我拥有的其他一些手表（只有Steinhart放大了这个日期。有些人抱怨边框的环很难转，我最初经历过同样的问题。 YouTube上的视频建议将手表浸泡在水中一个小时，然后在湿润时转动挡圈。我试了两次，确实成功了。现在，表圈环移动得足够轻但仍然非常紧，并且可以摆动。挡板有120次摆动，更常见的是60次。

因此，用85美元，你会得到一个非常好看的Submariner和黑客精工机芯手表，而且几乎像石英手表一样准确。还有什么不喜欢的呢？

e Star, and my hand full of Timex watches make me very happy. But I must say, I'm a sucker for a homage watch. Especially the Submariner. What a classic! And while I appreciate the brands that make there's different enough to stand on their own, I wanted a Sub homage as aesthetically close to the real thing. I kept coming back to the Invicta, as has so many of the details of the Submariner. I kept hesitating, because, as you probably know, the Invicta brand is quite a despised brand in the high-end watch world. But for the price, I decided there was little to lose.

I must say, I've had my share of fashion watches (i.e. Fossil) that have lasted me 6 months, and I've had my Seikos that have lasted me many years, and this definitely feels like it's in the "last for years" category. It's a solid, high quality watch. And this is probably why it's hated by so many. Invicta is a high marketing operation that plays to all kinds of tastes (95% is not for me!), but this one is classic. I liken Invicta to the New Era 5950 baseball cap. Do they make hats that look absolutely absurd? Yes! But will that keep me from owning an on-field MLB authentic cap of my favorite team? Of course not. So yes, pass by those ridiculous over-the-top Invictas out there. But don't pass up this. I'm certain the Rolex is ten times the watch this is, but it's also 80 times the price! If I get five years out of this, I'll have gotten 10 times the value.

Bottom line is, this is a solid watch, it keeps fantastic time, and it's absolutely gorgeous too. It looks great on all my nato and zulu straps, and the bracelet that comes with it passes muster with me. I've included photos of the 8926OB with a leather strap to show its versatility.

我必须说，我拥有的时尚手表使用时间至少都超过了六个月（即Fossil），而且我的Seikos已经用了很多年，而且是绝对已经用了好几年的那种。 这是一款很耐用，品质很不错的手表。这可能就是为什么它被这么多人讨厌的原因。 Invicta的营销手段很高级，满足了各种需求，这手表是很经典的。我将Invicta比作New Era 5950棒球帽。他们会制作那些看起来十分荒谬的帽子吗？会！但这会让我因此放弃去买MBL里我最喜欢的球队的帽子吗？当然不会。所以，是的，略过Invictas那些荒谬的手段。但是不要错过这个。我确定劳力士的手表的质量是它的十倍，但劳力士的价格也是这只表的80倍！如果我用了五年，我将获得10倍的价值。

最重要的是，这是一款耐用的手表，它的时间准确，而且外观也非常好看。它和我的nato和祖鲁zulu表带搭配起来都很棒。我已经上传了带有表带的8926OB的照片，以展示其多功能性。