原文: I bought this watch 6 years ago (and again later as a gift). Now after these many years, I can say with some confidence that if you're looking for what I was looking for, this is as good as it gets for the money.
PROS:
1. Eco-drive. (Of course.) So far, no hiccup whatsoever. I do wea
r it everyday so the battery never got a chance to discharge. I hate to drive to the mall and wait for half an hour just to get your battery swapped. And the new battery (which often cost a bundle) inevitably lasts much shorter than the original battery. That's why I stopped using my previous watch (which is a pretty good Victorinox).
2. Dual calendar. To me it's a must. I look at my watch to find the date to sign/date (and I do that quite often). During summer time when I'm not teaching, I can lose track of what day it is, so that's must for me too.
3. Reasonably clean face. How difficult it is to get a really simple, classic design: large numerals, black on white or white on black? It turns out: quick difficult. The numerals are too narrow for my liking. I'd go with the Timex watches if they had life-long batteries. On the balance, the design is good enough.
4. Price. For less than $100, it's got a very good value-to-price ratio. (I didn't find anything better 6 years ago, which is why I bought this one.)
CONS: (quite minor)
1. (This isn't their fault as much as mine.) Leather strap. I liked the classy look. The black leather definitely got that. But unfortunately, genuine leather doesn't like water (being a guy, that wasn't something I know as women seem to very early on). So what good is a water-resistant watch with water-phobic straps. After some contact with water and just sweating in ball games, the back side of the leather is in ugly shape. I suppose I can change the strap, but the point is you still have to worry about it if the new strap is still leather.
2. No glowing-in-the-dark hands. No matter how shiny the hands look like, you can't tell time in the dark. The thing that bugs me is how difficult is that.
3. You need to be careful pulling out the crown for date adjustment (which happens a few times a year, itself a nuisance). If you pull too hard, it'll get into the outer gear and you might accidentally change the time a little bit. (It happens to most watches that have dual calendar without perpetual calendar.) And I want my watch to be accurate -- it's not a piece of jewelry to me.
Neither:
1. Cover is not scratch resistant, but doesn't appear to scratch super easily.
It's been a good watch, especially considering the price. Since I'm in engineering, getting even minor issues addressed carries psychological satisfaction. So I'm getting a new watch that has atomic synchronization, perpetual calendar, eco-drive, and it's going to have stainless steel straps so in theory I don't need to worry about anything again. But that watch is setting me back $380.
显示更多>>
译文: 这只手表是我6年前买的(后来又作为礼物买了)。这么多年过去了,我可以自信地说,如果你找的东西和我要找的东西,这块手表绝对物超所值。
赞成的意见:
1、光动能。
(当然)到目前为止,我每天都戴它,所以电池还没有机会放电。我讨厌开车去商场等半个小时,只是为了换电池。而且新电池(通常要一捆)必定比原来的电池用的时间短。这就是为什么我不再用以前的手表(是一个很好的维氏手表)。
2、双日历。
这对我来说是必要的。我要看手表来找日期(我经常这样做)。在夏天,我不在教学的时候,我会忘记是哪一天,所以我也必须要有这个。
3、可合理清洁的表面。
买到一只简约、经典的手表有多难?大数字,黑面白底或者白面黑底就行。结果事实证明:非常困难。数字太窄了,我不喜欢。如果它们有终生使用的电池,我会觉得它和天美时手表一样。平衡一点的是,设计是足够好的。
4、价格。
不到100美元,它有一个很好的性价比。(6年前我没有发现比这更好的东西,所以我买了这个。)
缺点:(很小)
1、表带(这不是他们的错,也不是我的错)。我喜欢优雅的表面,黑色皮革肯定是这样的,但不幸的是,真正的皮革防水(作为一个男人,我不知道这一点,因为女人似乎很早就知道)。那么有防水表带的手表有什么用呢?与水接触后,皮革背面会特别丑。我想我可以换根表带,但关键是如果新表带还是皮的话,还有点担心。
2、黑暗中指针不发光。无论指针看起来多么闪闪发光,你都无法在黑暗中看清时间。令我烦恼的是这真的困扰了我。
3、你需要小心地拔出表冠进行日期调整(这种情况每年都要调几次,本身就很麻烦)。如果你用力过猛,它会进入外齿轮,你可能会不小心改变一点时间。(大多数手表都是不带万年历的双日历)。我希望我的手表准确一点,这对我来说不是一件首饰。
不满:
1、表面不耐刮,但不太容易划伤。这是个好手表,考虑到价格。因为我是工程专业的,即使解决一些小问题也会带来心理上的满足感。所以我得到了一块新的手表,它有原子同步,万年历,光动能设备,有不锈钢带,所以从理论上说,我不需要担心任何事情了。但是那只手表为我省了380美元。