原文: UPDATE 2/7/17 - Still lovin' it. Just an exceptional, solid router that just plain works. Range is amazing, and it just delivers with a fairly complicated setup (again, I have Fire sticks, half a dozen tablets, multiple wireless desktops upstairs and downstairs, PlayStations, multiple IP cameras i
ncluding one outdoors about 100 feet away from the router, you get the picture). THE ONE HANGUP I had was that it didn't have a dedicated WPS button; well, I was just flat out wrong. There IS a tiny WPS button on the backside right next to the base of an antenna next to the LAN ports. I'm used to seeing the button on the front of routers, and it is so small I just didn't see it on the back, and there was no mention in the basic documentation (but a helpful Amazon user found more info on the TP-Link website and let me know - thanks for that and thanks for reading my review!).
ORIGINAL REVIEW:
I recently gave Uverse the boot, and went back with Time Warner (now Spectrum). Uverse forced me to use their lousy router (replaced 5 times - don't even get me started - horrible couple of years). I also had a router that was about 5 years old (Cisco / Linksys), and so I figured I would be good to go. Well, performance of my IP cameras, laptops, and Amazon Fire Stick were not so great with my new setup. I figured it was Time Warner's fault, but decided to take a gamble and just flat-out replace my router.
So I arrived on the TP-Link AC1200 due to the low price but high performance specs. And I have to say I am blown away with the performance. I have been running it for over a month, and not ONCE have I had a hiccup where I needed to reboot the router. I have now been able to easily do port forwarding for my IP cameras, and connect as many devices as I want, with zero issues. Even my Fire Stick now performs like a champ (almost zero hesitation, even running wirelessly in a bedroom about 50 feet from the router). The range is excellent, signal strength excellent, reliability excellent, and I'm thrilled.
My ONLY complaint is that much to my surprise (and maybe because I still have a mindset and skillset more relevant to 2010?!?), there is not a dedicated WPS connection button. All of my IP cameras use WPS to connect, and so each time I had to open up a browser window, log into the router, and go to the advanced settings in the wireless screen to temporarily enable WPS. Not a show stopper because I rarely need this function, but it is a pain to have to go through those steps. Who knows, maybe that is a "security feature", but for me it is just a little extra trouble.
Regardless, the incredible performance and stability of this unit has made it WELL WORTH the upgrade over my previous router which on paper still "should" have been good enough for my needs. Very highly recommended!
显示更多>>
译文:
2017/2/17更新
还是很喜欢它。特殊牢固,工作范围惊人,它只是提供一个相当复杂的设置(我有打火棒,6台平板,楼上下有多个无线桌面,PlayStation,多个IP摄像机,包括距离路由器100英尺外的一个户外的,可以看图片)。我曾经有一个挂钩是没有专用的WPS按钮;嗯,我只是错了。靠近LAN端口的天线底部,背面右侧有一个小WPS按钮。我习惯看到路由器前面的按钮,它实在太小,我没有看到它在后面,没有提到的基本文档(但有用的亚马逊用户发现更多信息在TP-Link网站,让我知道 - 谢谢你,谢谢阅读我的评论!)
原评:
我最近不用Uverse了,用回时代华纳(现在的Spectrum)。反过来强迫我使用他们糟糕的路由器(更换了五次,前些年真的是太糟糕,都启动不了)。我还有一台用了五年的路由器(思科/ Linksys),所以我想我会很好。那么我的IP摄像机,笔记本电脑和亚马逊Fire Stick的性能并不是很好。我认为这是时代华纳的错,但最后冒风险决定试一试,替换我的路由器。
所以我买了TP-Link AC1200,因为价格低但性能很高。我不得不说,我对运行很满意。我已经运行了一个多月,而不是一次,需要重新启动路由器的时候就要停顿一会儿。我现在已经能够轻松地为我的IP摄像机执行端口转发,并且连接尽可能多的设备,零问题。即使我的Fire Stick现在表现得像一个冠军(几乎毫不犹豫,甚至在离路由器大概50英尺的卧室里无线运行)。范围非常好,信号强度优秀,可靠性好,我很激动。
我唯一想吐槽的是我的惊喜(也许是因为我仍然有一个心态和技能与2010更相关?!),没有一个专用的WPS连接按钮。我所有的IP摄像机都使用WPS进行连接,因此每次打开浏览器窗口时,都可以登录路由器,并进入无线屏幕的高级设置,以临时启用WPS。因为我很少需要这个功能,所以不是一个显示屏,不过要经历这些步骤是一件很痛苦的事情。谁知道,也许这是一个“安全功能”,但对我来说这只是一个额外的麻烦。
无论如何,这个东西的令人难以置信的表现和稳定性使得WEF WORTH升级了我以前的路由器,纸上仍然“应该”已经足够满足我的需求。非常推荐!