原文:UPDATE: I sent the watch in under warranty, and instead of getting my watch back fixed, I got an estimate from Citizen for repair of $215.02. LOL. Description seems to put the responsibity on me (at least I infer--since they claim it's internally rusty and the caseback gasket is worn. Well isn't
that their responsibility? Citizen warranty is obviously worthless. I did like the watch, but I'm lowering my rating to 2 stars because of that. Find another brand, or perhaps spend less and just buy a new one every three years.I really loved this watch. Very nice looking, very lightweight and thin. However, at around 3 years old, the hour hand stopped moving past 12. So now it's always 12-something. I can send it in for service under the 5 year warranty, and will, but it's going to be very inconvenient to be without the watch while it's gone (and we'll still need to see how well the warranty is honored). I still have a self-winding Seiko sports watch that I've had since I was 13, almost 50 years ago, which still works. It's just too heavy and it also it has an orange face, so not something for daily wear anymore.
显示更多>>
译文:更新:我在保修期内寄回去了手表,不是让我的手表恢复好,我付的修理价大概是215.02美元。真好笑。描述似乎把责任放在了我身上(至少我推断 - 因为他们声称它内部生锈并且底盖垫片磨损了。那不是他们的责任吗?西铁城保修显然毫无价值。我确实喜欢这款手表,但我由于这个原因,我将我的评级降低到2星。买了另一个品牌,或者花更少的钱,每三年购买一个新品牌。
我真的很喜欢这款手表。非常好看,非常轻巧且薄。然而,在用了大约3年时,时针停止移动,停在了12的位置。所以现在它总是显示12。我可以在5年保修期内将其送去维修,但是在没有手表的情况下会变得非常不方便(我们仍然需要看看保修是否得到尊重)。我仍然有一个自动上弦的精工运动手表,这是我从13岁开始用的,差不多50年前,它仍然有效。它太重了,它也有橙色的表盘,所以不再适合日常佩戴。