美国海淘 TOMMY HILFIGER 男士四角紧身内裤4条装约￥245

Name: 美国购物TOMMY HILFIGER 男士四角紧身内裤4条装
Price: 34.99 USD
Availability: allfxpd_wap.php?fxpditemid=14352071381435207138299

商城：美国亚马逊

2025-11-01

joke频道分享

直达链接

TOMMY HILFIGER 男士四角紧身内裤采用纯棉制造，穿着舒适透气，更不过引起皮肤过敏。可以直接机洗，方便日常穿着。当然，小编建议用洗衣机清洗时，要添加消毒液以确保更加卫生刚干净。

来自美国亚马逊网站的买家最新点评(7)

Stephen Baer点评道：
2026-02-15 10:25:42
原文：Like probably every other person in the world, I've noticed a steady decline in the quality of my clothes. I call this the Walmart Effect. After the last several years watching my Hanes and FTL underwear basically disintegrate and lose their fit after just a few washes, I got fed up and bought these
ostensibly higher-quality briefs. Bad Idea. While they do use a bit more fabric to make them, and the waistband is MUCH better, I was disappointed to find that rest of these briefs aren't any better than the cheap kind. Basically, the only part of them that is an improvement (for triple the price of the others) is the waistband, which uncoincidentally also serves as the very visible label. I apparently purchased a Tommy Hilfiger sign that just happens to be attached to my underwear. The actual underwear, however, is just as crappy and as stretched and out of shape as the cheaper ones. I remain underwhelmed by my underwear choices. Would somebody PLEASE start making underwear that A) Doesn't ride up in the crotch whenever you move, B) stays on your thighs in the case of boxer-briefs, C) are made of a cotton blend knit that stretches not just OUT, but BACK.

显示更多>>
译文：像世界上所有其他人一样，我注意到我的衣服质量下降。我称之为沃尔玛效应。过去几年，我看到我的Hanes和FTL内衣在几次洗涤后基本瓦解，失去适应能力，我已经厌倦了购买这些表面上较高质量的内裤。真是馊主意。虽然他们使用更多的面料来制造，而腰带更好，但我很失望地发现，这些简报的其余部分不比廉价的那样好。基本上，其中唯一的一部分是腰带的改进，这也是一个不可思议又显而易见的标签。我显然购买了一个刚刚贴在我内衣上的汤米希尔菲格（Tommy Hilfiger）标志。然而，实际的内衣与更便宜的内衣一样笨拙，会拉伸和变形。我仍然对内衣的选择不知所措。如果有人会开始制作内衣我想提出以下几条建议：A : 移动的时候裆部不会滑上去，B : 如果是拳击内裤的话不会贴在大腿上，C : 混棉纺针织物材质，不是向外延伸而是向内延伸。
C. M. Frye点评道：
2026-04-09 10:03:09
原文：Purchased my first set in Oct 2014. After using for over 6 months found them to be the best I have ever purchased. I purchased more in Apr 2015 and I am now VERY VERY disappointed. The most recent group where just crap and I am returning them. Every part of the garment was very inferior...my wife, w
ithout prompting noted the significant quality difference. Attached a photo of the labeling of each which, is very different. So I do have a question that the new bunch might be knock offs. The ones in the foreground are the "good ones." The photo shows the "bad" one's label; however, it is very difficult to read with the naked eye.

显示更多>>

译文：在2014年10月买下了第一套。使用6个月左右后，我发现他们是我买过的最好的内裤。我在2015年4月买了更多，但我现在非常失望。最近买下的套装实在是令人失望，所以我把它们退了回去。裤子上的每一部分都非常糟糕，我的妻子也没有提示注意到质量差异很大。我附上了每张标签的照片，它们非常不同。所以我有一个问题，这套新的可能是瑕疵品。前景中的那些是“好的”。照片显示“坏”的标签; 然而，这用肉眼是很难辨别的。
Anthony点评道：
2026-01-04 19:09:56
原文：I bought my original set of these boxer briefs from a Ross or Marshall's or somewhere like. They were (are) awesome! Years later I still have them in rotation with no problems. I actually purchased another set from Amazon to replace a different brand that wore down a bit more quickly, so naturally I
figured I'd stick with what works. Something along the line changed though. The version I ordered online from Amazon is definitely lower quality. While they otherwise feel about the same thickness, when taking the fabric between my fingers and stretching with and against the threads it's much easier to pull apart the newer constructions. A few of the newer variety even started getting small holes in them after a few months. For comparison, remember I'm comparing these to the models that already have a few years of use on them. There's no comparison. The newer ones were made in Sri Lanka. I don't know where the older pairs were made, the tags have completely faded.So they're not terrible, but not the quality I expected. I will likely have to replace these newer varieties before I have to replace their predecessors.

显示更多>>
译文：
我从罗斯或马歇尔或某个地方买过原款拳击短裤。它们是真的很棒！几年后，我仍然能毫无问题地换上它们。实际上我从亚马逊买了另一套，好能快点代替一个不同的品牌，所以我自然认为我会坚持这是有用的。尽管缝线处改变了一些。我从亚马逊订购的版本肯定是质量较差的。虽然感觉到厚度相同，但是当织物在我的手指之间伸展和对着线时，更容易拉开较新的结构。几个较新的内裤甚至在几个月后开始出现小洞。为了比较，我将这些与已经使用几年的模型进行比较。没有比较新的是斯里兰卡制造的。我不知道老款实在哪里制造的，因为标签已经完全褪色了。

他们没有很糟糕，但不是我预期的质量。我会找新的牌子来代替它们。
PriorLight点评道：
2026-06-12 12:08:21
原文：This used to be a great product. The material was thick and soft, the fit was comfortable and they never rode up. As someone who works out a lot, it's hard to find a pair of boxer briefs that fit properly.My previous pairs of tommy hilfiger lasted for almost a year without any problems, but this l
atest version of the product has plummeted in quality. After a single wash I'm already seeing holes and rips. As others have pointed out, the material feels scratchy and thin. The legs stretch way too easily and no longer have the snug feeling they used to.Don't make the mistake of wasting money on these.

显示更多>>
译文：这曾经是一款伟大的产品。材料厚实而柔软，舒适合适，而且裆部从未上滑。作为一个经常锻炼的人，很难找到一条合适的拳击内裤。

我以前有几条恶魔hilfiger，穿了近一年没有出现任何问题，但最新款的质量却在下降。洗了一次之后，我就已经看到洞穴和裂痕了。正如其他人所言，这种材料感觉很容易拉伸，很薄。双腿伸展方式太简单，不再有舒适的感觉。

提醒各位不要浪费这些钱。
Kevin L. Bender点评道：
2026-03-15 07:46:21
原文：I have been using this product for 20 years and they have made them cheaper, thinner fabric and fit looser because of that. Disappointed they ruined a great product
译文：
我穿这个牌子的内裤已经长达20年，它们价格越来越便宜，材料越来越薄，越来越松，太失望了，他们毁掉了一款伟大的产品。
Kat点评道：
2026-05-12 20:57:00
原文：After the first time I wore this this seemed to just lossen up. I compared them in size to US Polo ASSN, Dockers and Lucky Brand Boxers and as the picture shows all are the same size yet this are way wider then all three of them. I can understand sizes are different between brands but it's three di
fferent brands. They also feel thin as if they will break soon. Wish I could exchange them but they are undies and one is worn so I'm stuck with this baggy boxers. Sucks. Shame because I thought they would be cool to have. I also added a picture for comparison with another from the pack that's brand new. You can see how much it loosened up.

显示更多>>

译文：穿了一次之后，裤子就松了。我把它们的尺寸与美国Polo ASSN、Dockers、Lucky Brand Boxers这些品牌进行对比。如图所示，这个牌子的尺寸要比其他三个品牌要略宽一点。我知道不同牌子之间的尺寸大小都是不同的，但是这是三个牌子啊！穿过以后裤子还会变薄，好像很快就会坏了。我好希望能够进行退换，但是这是内裤啊，而且有一条还磨损了，所以我真的在这里遇到困难了。太遗憾了，我本以为它们会很酷的。我上传了新旧对比图，各位可以看一下裤子松了多少。
Vojnitek点评道：
2026-05-03 11:02:50
原文：I originally liked these, but they turned out to be much worse for me than I originally assumed. Refer to my pictures - The crotch wore out within a year, which is very disappointing. The sad thing is that the size is right for my waist. They fit very comfortably - not too tight. Though, it is worth
mentioning that my thighs are a bit larger than normal for someone of my build...but if that's all it takes to tear large holes into these from simple day-to-day wear, then I would not recommend them in general.

显示更多>>

译文：一开始我还挺喜欢的，但是久而久之就变得比我想象中要糟糕了。各位可以参考我上传的图片，这是一年之内裆部的磨损情况，真是令人失望。悲伤的是，尺寸又非常适合我的腰，不会很紧，很舒服。尽管这样，仍然值得一提的是，我的大腿比一般人的要粗，这样就可能会在日复一日的穿着之后造成更大面积的磨损...我不打算向普通人推荐。